It was when I started imagining
an argument that we never had:
an argument that we never had:
you would avert your eyes
as I re-stated my case.
as I re-stated my case.
There could be a scurrying
in mid-peripheral distance.
A seeming 'plot' was averted,
by whom it is no longer clear.
All indications would
remain inconclusive.
We never believed in shielding you
or your associates
from the avalanche
of modifications.
A target will loom as
gauze to a 'wicked one'.
Stealth is indicated
by your various refusals.
At times we pack in vain,
only to find egress denied.
(Stand up and feign wonderment.)
We will cheapen this
when it suits us,
any assumption in repair
sucks appropriate fluid.
Gashes threaten to reappear for naught,
chunks to willing players.
No comments:
Post a Comment